Order list
Monday, October 17, 2022
7 GVRs · 55 denied · 2 habeas denied · 6 mandamus denied · 4 in pending cases · The Court’s PDF · 598 U.S.
Summary dispositions7
- 21-1418Medardo Queg Santos v. United StatesThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Xiulu Ruan v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
- 21-1572Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Edmond CarmonaThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
- 22-5061Dewayne Joseph v. United StatesThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Concepcion v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
- 22-5075Courtney Newman v. United States
- 22-5076Holli Womack v. United States
- 22-5077Cynthia Clemons v. United States
- 22-5346Sylvia Hofstetter v. United StatesThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Xiulu Ruan v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
Orders in pending cases4
- 22M22LABRANCHE, AMOS V. SCHUMACHER/FFVA MUTUAL INSURANCE
- 22M23KOMATSU, TOWAKI V. CUBESMART, ET AL.The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
- 22-22David A. Tropp v. Travel Sentry, Inc.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
- 22-5424Jesus Miguel Arreola-Ochoa v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney GeneralThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 7, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Certiorari denied55
- 21-462Jolie Johnson v. Bethany Hospice and Palliative Care LLC
- 21-936United States, ex rel. Cathy Owsley v. Fazzi Associates, Inc.
- 21-1145Molina Healthcare of Illinois, Inc. v. Thomas Prose
- 21-1394John Fitisemanu v. United States
- 21-1464Emond S. Gulley v. Kansas
- 21-7648Luis Fernando Ceja, aka Chako v. United States
- 21-8017Stephen Scott Meals, Jr. v. United States
- 22-44Westley Devone Harris v. Alabama
- 22-52Ariyan Incorporated, dba Discount Corner v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
- 22-122Philip Snyder v. Tenth Presbyterian Church
- 22-145Aidong Chen v. KPMG LLP
- 22-151Lasean Dejong Houston v. Estate of Lasean Dejong Houston
- 22-153Wanda Bowling v. Lester John Dahlheimer
- 22-162Tariq B. Alabbassi v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
- 22-164Mark Elliott Stuart v. Douglas Gerlach, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
- 22-169Jay Lin, et ux. v. Hudson City Savings Bank
- 22-171Centro Médico del Turabo, Inc., dba Hospital Hima San Pablo Caguas and Hospital Hima San Pablo Fajardo, v. Unión General de Trabajadores
- 22-173Roger Swartz v. Board of Trustees of University of Pennsylvania
- 22-183Bryan Cowan v. Masa Nathaniel Warden
- 22-189Igor Lukashin v. Washington State Department of Revenue
- 22-198Ayse Sen v. Amazon.com, Inc.
- 22-248Larry Tawney, Jr. v. Portage County, Ohio
- 22-257Lorraine Adell v. Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless
- 22-262Berkley V. Walker v. BOKF, National Association, dba Bank of Albuquerque, N.A.
- 22-280Rashid A. Buttar v. Rachan Damidi Reddy
- 22-5109Teddy Brian Sanchez v. Ronald Broomfield, Warden
- 22-5306Micky Rife v. United States
- 22-5356Joseph Montrel Bourgeois v. Texas
- 22-5357Deanna D. v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services
- 22-5361Ernest Bustos v. Bexar Appraisal District
- 22-5362Agustin Garcia v. New Jersey
- 22-5369Milton Lee Gardner v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
- 22-5375Nathaniel Waugh v. A. Ralph
- 22-5383Lynn M. Giovanni v. New Jersey
- 22-5385J. S. v. Texas
- 22-5396Timothy J. Hill v. Oklahoma
- 22-5405Perry Sawano v. Colorado
- 22-5409Jamal A. Bowman v. Michigan
- 22-5443Robert L. Davis v. Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida
- 22-5447Christopher Schneider v. Bank of America, N.A.
- 22-5448Roger C. Cassidy v. Florida
- 22-5462Wilbur Irick v. New York
- 22-5537Joseph William Rendon v. Iowa
- 22-5593Richard Anthony Rodriguez v. California
- 22-5603Faustino Sanchez-Lugo v. United States
- 22-5606Jesus Guadalupe Amparano-Torres v. United States
- 22-5610Andre Thompson v. United States
- 22-5614Michael Lee Gordon v. United States
- 22-5623Freda J. Day v. Oprah Winfrey
- 22-5635Vladimir Vladimirovic Brik v. United States
- 22-5641Jay Eugene Reed v. United States
- 22-5663Danny Terron Roney v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
- 22-5354Ricardo L. Noble v. PennsylvaniaThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- 22-5358James L. Miller v. Amir Kashani
- 22-5609Herve Wilmore v. United StatesThe motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Habeas corpus denied2
- 22-5650In Re Bobby D. Hathaway-Bey
- 22-5651In Re Randolph Lavon Carr-ElThe petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
Mandamus denied6
- 22-5347In Re Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
- 22-5374In Re Darris Newsome
- 22-5384In Re Randell Joseph Redmond
- 22-5398In Re Douglas Cornell Jackson
- 22-5407In Re James R. AustinThe petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
- 22-5388In Re Roszetta Marie McNeillThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).