Lasean Dejong Houston v. Estate of Lasean Dejong Houston, et al.

Show good cause whether petitioners equi­ table primary rights are not destroyed by any People bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust, who presume that petitioners “is not” a People called Moors, americas aboriginal illinoisan national, and Subject of theAl Maroc Shereefian Empire, “but not citizen of the united states for the district of Columbia, nor a Citizen of the united states of america in congress assemble; that a trust relation “does not” exist between petitioners, as Subjects of theAl Maroc Shereefian Empire, and the united states of america in congress assemble;

Show good cause whether the petitioners, as a People called Moors, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire, “do not” have a special and partic­ ular political status; “is not” entitled to his inviolate equitable primary rights protected by the Maxims of Equity, and stipulated in the Treaty of Marrakech 1787 ARTICLE XXI., the Treaty of Marrakech 1836 ARTICLE XXI., the Treaty of Tunis 1824 ARTICLE XII., and all the Barbary Treaties through 1880 Madrid, still in full force and effect as of this date; the Article III, § 2§§ 1, of the 1789 constitution for the united states of america in Congress assembled, the Judiciary Act of 1789 1 stat 73 § 9. §11, §16, § 20, § 25., and § 26. and equity jurisprudence;

Show good cause whether, as People bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust, the lower court’s and agent’s decision to dismiss petitioners claim, as the cestui que/beneficiary of the Trusts/treaties, “does not” destroy the equitable primary rights of the peti­ tioners as a People called Moors; “is not” contrary to equity, good conscience, and good reason; and “is not”