Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Igor Lukashin v. Washington State Department of Revenue
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Washington, No. 100437-1 · judgment March 4, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
I f ' . *1. ESTIONS PRESENTED
-
Whether a state court may enter a filing !■ X i ban (or a pre-filing review order) with no pre-deprivation notice or post-deprivation opportunity to be heard; if not, whether it should be summarily GVRed for violating Due Process
-
Whether this Court should adopt CA9’s DeLong and / or CA2’s Safir standard to establish the Due Process floor before filing bans or pre-filing review orders are entered against pro se nonlawyer litigants.
-
Whether, in light of the Court’s intervention precedents last term, a pro se nonparty nonlawyer may attempt to intervene post-decision on appeal in state or federal courts to point out inequitable treatment or seek an authoritative and binding interpretation of legal issues the parties raised but no longer have an interest in advancing or defending?
-
Must an order denying intervention post decision on appeal provide a statement of reasons?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Igor Lukashin
For respondent
Callie Anne Castillo
Lane Powell PC
Proceedings
- Oct 17 2022Petition DENIED.
- Sep 28 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
- Sep 21 2022Waiver of right of respondent Lakeside Industries, Inc. to respond filed.
- Sep 01 2022Waiver of right of respondent Washington State Department of Revenue to respond filed.
- Aug 01 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2022)
- May 23 2022Application (21A750) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 1, 2022.
- May 16 2022Application (21A750) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 2, 2022 to August 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.