Aidong Chen v. KPMG LLP, et al.

How to deal with the compromised judges in the lower courts? How to deal with the systematic and institutional discrimination from the 3rd circuit appealing court (USCA3)? How to deal with the situation that USCA3 clerks got compromised, which is evidenced by the facts that they prevented plaintiff the access to the E-filing even the helpdesk agreed, allowed way overdue motion from defendants, and made decisions without judges? How to deal with the problem that big corporation can compromise, if not control, the judges, then overtake the cases from the originally and randomly assigned compliant judges, and later exercised reckless bias, stubbornly insisted in the case even after requesting for assigning back, randomly reassignment or escalation? How to deal with the situation that the compromised judges allowed defendants to ignore summons, failed to form jury even explicitly requested, allow no disclosure even previous judge ordered, allow no deposition, allow no debate, allow no trail, allowed fake evidence from defendants while concealing plaintiffs solid written evidence, and threaten plaintiff not to disclose to the public? How to deal with the situation that the compromised judges acted as the de facto defendant attorney when the defendant attorney refused to discuss? How to deal with the cases that judges in the same courthouse combat each other, both in federal and USCA3? Could the Supreme Court save the last decency of US judicial system? Could the Supreme Court use RICO to