Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Larry Tawney, Jr. v. Portage County, Ohio, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 21-3809 · judgment June 15, 2022


Certiorari denied · October 17, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Whether a trial court properly dismisses, as a matter of law, pursuant to Rule 56(c), F.R.C.P., a plaintiff’s complaint wherein the plaintiff seeks compensation for claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his Eighth Amendment rights against various defendants, a Monell claim against the county, and a state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against 25 defendants. In one fashion or another, all of these claims concerned a rather brutal beating experienced by Plaintiff while in the custody of the Portage County Jail. Summary judgment was granted based upon the District Court’s finding that that no reasonable jury could conclude that the beating had actually occurred based upon video and photographic evidence presented. However, records from the jail called into question the accuracy of this evidence. Consequently, the District Court clearly relied upon a weighing exercise which is prohibited in summary judgment proceedings.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Michael Alan Partlow
Law Office

For respondent
Frank H. Scialdone
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 17 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 28 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
  3. Sep 26 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent Portage County, Ohio, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Sep 12 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)