Order list
Monday, June 17, 2024
4 granted · 71 denied · 7 mandamus denied · 6 rehearings denied · 8 in pending cases · 1 discipline · 2 orders · The Court’s PDF · 602 U.S.
Certiorari granted4
- 23-217E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera
- 23-909Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting and Construction Co., Inc. v. United States
- 23-970NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
- 23-1127Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Todd HeathThe petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
Orders in pending cases8
- 23A1007Judy Brannberg v. Colorado Civil Rights DivisionThe application for writ of injunction addressed to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.
- 23M99IN RE GAVIN B. DAVISThe motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus with the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the declaration of indigency under seal is denied.
- 23M100TINDALL, JAMES W. V. CIRThe motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal is denied.
- 23-6450Alfred Correa Dizon v. Vectrus Systems Corporation
- 23-6844In Re Deborah E. Gouch-Onassis
- 23-6970Kathy R. Allen v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied.
- 23-7346Oksana Marinaro v. Zimmer & Lewis, Attorneys & Counselor at Law
- 23-7348Oksana Marinaro v. Cheryl Eddy Benn, PCThe motions of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 8, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Orders2
- 23-959Colin Montague v. United StatesThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in her brief for the United States filed on May 17, 2024.
- 23-7550In Re Kinley MacDonaldThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Certiorari denied71
- 22-886Blenheim Capital Holdings Ltd. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 22-957Laurie A. Dermody v. Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services
- 23-582Rollo A. Barker, aka Rollo Narker v. New Jersey
- 23-645Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Johnathon Gregg
- 23-686Tiger Cela v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
- 23-741Iftikar A. Ahmed v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- 23-987Shalini Ahmed v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- 23-769Lyft, Inc. v. Million Seifu
- 23-846City of Sparks, Nevada v. Rosa Ester Brizuela, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Rolando Antonio Brizuela
- 23-931J. W. v. Elvin Paley
- 23-992Yemiel Delgado-Victorio v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
- 23-995Nadine Gazzola v. Kathleen Hochul, Governor of New York
- 23-1107Joan Ghougoian v. Lamarr Monson
- 23-1119Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.
- 23-1126David Streeter v. USAA General Indemnity Company
- 23-1138Angela Williams v. Joseph Lombardo, Governor of Nevada
- 23-1139John F. Gallagher v. Northampton County Revenue Appeals Board
- 23-1143Nelda Kellom, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terrance Kellom, Deceased v. United States
- 23-1147Jahmir Christopher Frank v. Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, Ohio
- 23-1160Derrick Williams v. Mississippi
- 23-1218Alfredo Navarro Hinojosa v. United States
- 23-1221Carlos A. Williams v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
- 23-1224Laila N. Hirjee v. United States
- 23-6244Edmond Carl Warrington v. United States
- 23-6427Carl A. Melvin v. Hampton-Newport Community News Services Board
- 23-6480Joseph D. Jones v. United States
- 23-6527Jermaine Anderson, Jr. v. Florida
- 23-6558Freddie Quinn v. Florida
- 23-6723Brandon Keith Owensby v. Florida
- 23-6724Terrence Michael Taylor, aka Terrance Michael Taylor v. United States
- 23-6960Tasha Mercedez Shelby v. Mississippi
- 23-7197Michael David Logering v. Morrison County Sheriff's Office
- 23-7202Craig Alford v. Lea Baylor, Director, Monroe County Correctional Facility
- 23-7209Angela L. McCarthy v. Walmart Inc.
- 23-7210Marqese Lynn Payne v. Janet Dowling, Warden
- 23-7211Andrew Burke v. Lieutenant Scott Soland
- 23-7212Keith P. Sequeira v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
- 23-7214Chanel Tarrant v. Christiana Care
- 23-7216Enrique Zacarias Diaz v. J. Highberger
- 23-7219Ferrill Joseph Volpicelli v. Renee Baker, Warden
- 23-7231Bryan Christopher O'Rourke v. Oklahoma
- 23-7233Chikezie Ottah v. National Grid
- 23-7236Sandra Black v. Naomi Friedrichsen
- 23-7237William Bruce Justice v. South Carolina
- 23-7241Michael Allen v. Fidencio N. Guzman, Acting Warden
- 23-7248Hector Negron-Espada v. Florida
- 23-7260Mark R. Zana v. Nevada
- 23-7264Samreen Riaz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- 23-7277Benny Stewart v. Tom Green, Warden
- 23-7281Alicia Marie Richards v. Ryal W. Richards
- 23-7290Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr. v. United States
- 23-7296George E. Lacey v. Illinois
- 23-7303Demetriaus L. Blaylock v. Illinois
- 23-7314S. C. v. Vermont
- 23-7379Michael Hebert v. Tim Hooper, Warden
- 23-7392Elaine Mickman v. Philadelphia Professional Collections, LLC
- 23-7414Mark A. VandenBoom v. Robert Strohmeyer
- 23-7423Glenn Francis v. Thomas Scarantino, Warden
- 23-7473Cody Ray Leveke, aka Cody Meyer, aka Cody Ray Meyers v. United States
- 23-7474Bogdan Nicolescu v. Dave Bobby, Warden
- 23-7491Caesar V. Vaca v. United States
- 23-7492Trezith Rashad Smart v. United States
- 23-7502Kevin Day v. United States
- 23-7505Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan v. United States
- 23-7508Matias Zarate v. United States
- 23-7512Dallas M. Acoff v. United States
- 23-7513Russell Foreman v. United States
- 23-7522Gonzalo Rodriguez v. United States
- 23-7528Aaron Matthew Rentfrow v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
- 23-853Credit Bureau Center, LLC v. Federal Trade CommissionThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- 23-862West Flagler Associates, Ltd., dba Magic City Casino v. Deb Haaland, Secretary of the InteriorThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Kavanaugh would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. See 28 U. S. C. §455 and Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, Canon 3B(2)(e) (prior judicial service).
Mandamus denied7
- 23-7230In Re Alissa M. Peterson
- 23-7291In Re Furvio Flete-Garcia
- 23-7315In Re Craig Michael Ralston
- 23-7382In Re Arthur JonesThe petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
- 23-1123In Re Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
- 23-1140In Re William B. JolleyThe petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are denied.
- 23-7458In Re Michael David HowerThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Rehearings denied6
- 23-744Arthur Lopez v. Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church
- 23-6533James O. Bradley v. Roy Cooper, Governor of North Carolina
- 23-6708Georgios V. Vloutis v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft
- 23-6819In Re Mary A. Nelson-Rogers
- 23-6847Tyrone Anthony Bell v. Heidi E. Washington, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
- 23-6905Paul Harris v. Oran SchachterThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
Attorney discipline1
- D-3137IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DENIS CHARLES ENGLISBYDenis Charles Englisby, of Chesterfield, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 29, 2024; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and a response having been filed; It is ordered that Denis Charles Englisby is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.