Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Angela Williams, et al. v. Joseph Lombardo, Governor of Nevada, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-16859 · judgment January 18, 2024


Certiorari denied · June 17, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 7% cert probability (95% interval 5%–10%)

Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a state or local-government respondent.

Question presented

Petitioners were sex trafficked within Nevada’s legalized prostitution system, and sued the businesses that trafficked them, and the government entities that licensed, incentivized, and profited from the businesses, alleging the defendants cooperated in Petitioners’ exploitation. Nevada government entities require persons in the sex trade to be controlled by a licensed business (i.e., a pimp), permit them to be subjected to debt bondage in legal brothels and strip clubs, and profit from the sex trafficking that results through licensing fees and taxes – including a state tax on escort agencies and strip clubs. Petitioners alleged that Respondents violated the Trafficking Victims Protection Act by benefiting from sex trafficking and the Thirteenth Amendment by enabling slavery. The district court determined that Petitioners stated a claim for sex trafficking against a brothel and for benefiting from trafficking against a strip club, but dismissed the government defendants, citing lack of causation for Article III standing. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit extended this Court’s principle that independent third parties “not before the court” may break the causal chain, Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992), to include parties to the case, who are before the court, concluding on this basis that Petitioners’ injuries from being trafficked by co-defendant sex trade businesses were not “fairly traceable” to government defendants. The questions presented are: 1. In an Article III standing analysis, may codefendants in a lawsuit, against whom a claim has been stated, be treated as independent third parties “not before the court” for purposes of determining traceability as to government actors?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Christen Michelle Price
National Center on Sexual Exploitation

For respondent
Joel K. Browning
Clark County District Attorney's Office -

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 17 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 28 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
  3. May 17 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Joseph Lombardo, In His Official Capacity as Governor of Nevada to respond filed.
  4. May 17 2024
    Waiver of right of respondents Joseph Lombardo and Aaron Ford to respond filed.
  5. May 13 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent County of Nye, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada to respond filed.
  6. May 09 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent City of Las Vegas to respond filed.
  7. Apr 22 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Clark County to respond filed.
  8. Apr 17 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)