In Re William B. Jolley

Is 29 C.F.R. f 1614 constitutional where Defendant HUD contends that the results of Investigation made under 29 C.F.R. ^1 1614 (HUD-00037-2019) has no value in the federal court suit where HUD-00037-2019 shows that HUD discriminated on the basis of Age and Disability according to the interpretation rules of 29 C.F.R. 1614; and where f 1614, used by all the federal agencies, has no provisions for compliance with the due process guarantee of the Constitution (No impartial tribunal, etc.); and If 1614 is suppose to cover discrimination in employment applications, employment, etc.; all “discrimination” types covered being statutory rights.