Order list
Monday, June 8, 2020
1 granted · 2 GVRs · 94 denied · 2 habeas denied · 1 mandamus denied · 4 in pending cases · 1 order · The Court’s PDF · 590 U.S.
Certiorari granted1
- 19-863Agusto Niz-Chavez v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney GeneralThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
Summary dispositions2
- 19-623Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP v. Balkrishna SettyThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).
- 19-5990David Alan Vogel v. United StatesThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Banister v. Davis, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).
Orders in pending cases4
- 19M140GUTIERREZ, JULIAN M. V. UNITED STATESThe motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time is denied.
- 18-1401David D. Peterson v. Linear Controls, Inc.The joint motion to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
- 19-631William P. Barr, Attorney General v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc.The motion of ACA International, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae out of time is denied.
- 19-7403Theodore C. Shove v. Ron Davis, WardenThe motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
Rehearing denied1
- 19-7692R. A. S. v. Montgomery County Children and Youth ServicesThe petition for rehearing is denied.
Certiorari denied94
- 19-685Edward George McGregor v. Texas
- 19-747Francisco Lopez Gamero v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
- 19-855Lenin Lugo v. United States
- 19-875OTO, L.L.C. v. Ken Kho
- 19-889Kaufman County, Texas v. Eunice J. Winzer, Individually and on Behalf of the Statutory Beneficiaries of Gabriel A. Winzer
- 19-1042Euince J. Winzer, Individually and on Behalf of the Statutory Beneficiaries of Gabriel A. Winzer v. Kaufman County, Texas
- 19-901Devon Drive Lionville, LP v. Parke Bank
- 19-997Gary S. Williky v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- 19-1054Christa Gail Pike v. Gloria Gross, Warden
- 19-1069Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited v. Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund
- 19-1070Jeffrey Alan Olson v. Pennsylvania
- 19-1084Dayton Michael Cramer v. United States
- 19-1180Robert Radcliffe v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
- 19-1182Smith Land Company v. Shawn A. Herhold
- 19-1190Samuel H. Sloan v. Creighton W. Sloan
- 19-1193Kristin D. Wilkinson v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline of the State Bar of Texas
- 19-1197GwanJun Kim v. City of Ionia, Michigan
- 19-1200Johndrell Elliott v. Ohio
- 19-1205Anthony J. Lucero v. Paul Gordon
- 19-1219Respect Washington v. Burien Communities for Inclusion
- 19-1227Judith Kerns v. Caterpillar, Inc.
- 19-1239Jackson Ridge Rehabilitation and Care v. Rhonda Meadows
- 19-1240Myron Hubbard v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
- 19-1271Toni Sharretts Collins v. William Zolnier
- 19-7076Cedrick Ponder v. United States
- 19-7153Ronald Johnson v. Missouri
- 19-7165Omar Macias-Macias v. United States
- 19-7451David Keith Rogers v. California
- 19-7469Olga Palamarchuk v. United States
- 19-7472Tymaine Akeen Lewis v. United States
- 19-7637Pedro Anthony Romero Cruz v. United States
- 19-7872Samuel A. Wilder v. William F. Krebs
- 19-8103Ramiro Rubi Ibarra v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
- 19-8134James Ricky Ezell v. Damon Hininger
- 19-8138Jeanette Woolsey-Ross v. James Woolsey
- 19-8157Brian Richardson v. Joshua Moore
- 19-8159Jeffrey Ramirez v. Joe M. Allbaugh, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
- 19-8164Eric T. Tolen v. Jeff Norman, Warden
- 19-8165Tanya Winters v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
- 19-8170Joe Robert Reynolds v. North Carolina
- 19-8174Camille T. Mata v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
- 19-8176Homer Lawrence Lane v. Alabama
- 19-8182Edward Paul Moss v. Arizona
- 19-8183Jose Nogales v. California
- 19-8185Floyd Dewaine Scott v. California
- 19-8186Leroy Staton v. Superintendent, Lee Correctional Institution
- 19-8189Jose E. Ramos v. Connecticut
- 19-8195Alens Charles v. Ric L. Bradshaw, Sheriff, Palm Beach County, Florida
- 19-8198Dora L. Adkins v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
- 19-8201James R. Householder v. Pennsylvania
- 19-8202Linda Gough v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company
- 19-8203Rashan J. Hunt v. Ohio
- 19-8206Zaryl G. Bush v. Ohio
- 19-8209Delgen Foye v. North Carolina
- 19-8210Peggy Gordon v. Holy Cross Hospital Germantown, Inc.
- 19-8213Jesus Rodriguez v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison
- 19-8217Blake Jones v. McKee Foods Corporation
- 19-8226Randy Phipps v. Rick Raemisch, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections
- 19-8227Joshua Dwayne Carrier v. Colorado
- 19-8245Scott Peters v. Illinois
- 19-8264Paul M. Gordon v. Arkansas
- 19-8270Earl Mayberry Johnson, Jr. v. The Florida Bar
- 19-8286Edward Tiger v. Florida
- 19-8297Leif O'Connell v. Dushan Zatecky
- 19-8301Stephen J. Mocco v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
- 19-8311John D. Dalen v. Federal National Mortgage Association
- 19-8319Tarvares James Watson v. Florida
- 19-8322Joseph Augustus Dixon v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
- 19-8362Henry M. Mitchell, Jr. v. California
- 19-8363Daniel R. McClain v. Kenneth Sharp, Warden
- 19-8371Angelo Ham v. Warden Williams
- 19-8379Herbert Burgess v. Illinois
- 19-8422Todd Lee Glenn v. United States
- 19-8431Ciro Cruz-Lopez v. United States
- 19-8437Joh-ner Taylor Wilson v. Illinois
- 19-8440Katherine O'Neal v. United States
- 19-8447Jeanette D. Davis v. Renee Thomas
- 19-8451Michael Skinner v. Raymond Madden, Warden
- 19-8453John Christopher Dobbs v. United States
- 19-8463Luis Ricardo Mayea-Pulido v. United States
- 19-8464Jamal Mitchell, aka Boo v. United States
- 19-8468Janice M. Shufford v. United States
- 19-8469Viengxay Chantharath v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
- 18-6172Sherman Edward Williams v. United States
- 18-7575Alexis Valdes Gonzalez v. United States
- 19-5451Michael Lawrence Robinson v. United States
- 19-6355Eric Mack v. United States
- 19-7148Jimmy Lee Boston v. United States
- 19-7506David Andrew Hunt, Lusion Yoshua Rice, and Dendrick Demond Hall v. United States
- 19-7527Marcus Rashawn Smith v. United States
- 19-7672Donte Deshawn Alston v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Sotomayor, respecting the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in St. Hubert v. United States, 590 U. S. ___ (2020) (Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari).
- 19-8153Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr. v. Celia SchwartzThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
- 19-8166Anthony Williams v. Muhammad NajiThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- 19-8467Juan Petis McLendon v. United StatesThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Habeas corpus denied2
- 19-8179In Re Harold Wayne NicholsThe petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
- 19-8475In Re Tarvares James WatsonThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Mandamus denied1
- 19-8205In Re Jonathan E. BrunsonThe petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.