Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Francisco Lopez Gamero v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 17-3198, 18-1104 · judgment July 3, 2019

Certiorari denied · June 8, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Carla Iveth Espinoza
Chicago Immigration Advocates Law Offices

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jun 08 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 19 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
  3. May 15 2020
    Reply of petitioner Francisco Lopez Gamero filed. (Distributed)
  4. May 01 2020
    Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 15 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2020.
  6. Apr 08 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Mar 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Mar 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2020.
  9. Feb 20 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 30, 2020.
  10. Feb 19 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2020 to March 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Jan 29 2020
    Response Requested. (Due February 28, 2020)
  12. Jan 15 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
  13. Jan 10 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Barr, William to respond filed.
  14. Dec 09 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
  15. Dec 09 2019
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.