Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Respect Washington v. Burien Communities for Inclusion, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, No. 77500-6-I · judgment September 9, 2019
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition and counsel who has filed here before.
Question presented
Twenty four states allow citizens to propose state or local legislation through the initiative and referendum process—a remnant reminder of that consent from which just powers derive. Over 30 years ago this Court expressly recognized that the initiative process rests at the heart of the First Amendment’s protection because it involves communication about governmental policies and constitutes core political speech. Nonetheless, after an initiative has met all time, place and manner restrictions, a routine practice has developed for political opponents to seek an injunction prohibiting people from expressing their views at the ballot box and courts have repeatedly issued such injunctions expressly based on the subject matter of the initiatives. Question: Whether the First Amendment protects the right of citizens to vote on an initiative that meets all time, place and manner requirements for the initiative to qualify for placement on the ballot.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard M. Stephens
Stephens & Klinge, LLP
For respondent
Michael R. Kenyon
Kenyon Disend, PLLC
Case
Subject area
First Amendment (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, June 8, 2020 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Jun 08 2020Petition DENIED.
- May 19 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
- Apr 28 2020Waiver of right of respondent City of Burien to respond filed.
- Apr 23 2020Waiver of right of respondent Burien Communities for Inclusion to respond filed.
- Apr 07 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)