Delgen Foye v. North Carolina

. Qot£>t \b(0: (Op, 1, ^UV HouJ D ID 7Ait L>,« ai Cs/fec-.Lb ^tlo5t 76 f\b'Di^SS 6iL WftKd. Ck CjMh&te Q.lSJ'UilJ dl+^tCAiJi % Tb TUL l/i&Wif/aiJ <$- 714/6 Pefif0s W7# AMaJD/^JA £/>ftT 7h 7l4e CbiOSjiToyibik}' c$- VUe. OlVjiT^-f) $7<iteS, Pd-'^/W^ fjj TI416 dairt ^ kVtlhdofi ?eAt|-nd hL. (Le-WeaLtiW uo I'ftt ]p^;^L ftLe£i £197 aw 76 ^Kiam»W€. VuVtfeid av Wa/ 8ie -uiftS ^ftkL/zea t&e. e<Liu$;«i9 r,s a^T/kiku&L O-bHT, HocL. ilnf f $S r iau>£. . ftp's. Vi mu UWV aib M6iu D/ft 7/47 US, C&utl t£a?Pe&U £&.£LlSaiL 7o AboM6 -Tfc ukLcrf^AJ 4 TifU Pelttioocii Tib« ftwei4w«i4 di&HT uuo«l-t/<«. Ll^1 C^\ls /1TU7/ORJ* f®.lsJiit§>< QSkVKibT x'iLit«jWuLi^7iikfJ «<ub <l)frf 7b rttoe- <ak PfisT e£LO£.o .Hsmlo OV -TH£. ft? Ti/oL, ?tfifitnJ<tL aba CooWfti &06 7*/£ feof 7«<? Hi ^ DeiUtaO 7H9 tliHr To fw VaulTlj ft Dthtttd L i/iclabhu Of W/S T/M aneAdiWhU 7c itfliiu ttu A CPminJftL ttt<iL, OOd. p£bte33 £!aus>£, BDeS7)Cd. h>f). X. UW/ PAiO HbuJ DID TH£ DA. ccbE7 of APPEALS 6[)£ll6CU THE \ LinifcfOEiL ffcuirtm;+/6lUKL &SM7 S^m\ -TliftL. srefcbV 7£l‘ftL fi. OkSbQl '/Aif L^rrM ft/h&idflUii/i' 'Tb h 7\Ac Lof^aUoaN cum>t, . Tl4-£ d^fWifai c£^ £LSaii4£