Order list
Monday, January 27, 2020
137 denied · 1 habeas denied · 4 mandamus denied · 13 rehearings denied · 9 in pending cases · 11 discipline · 1 order · The Court’s PDF · 589 U.S.
Orders in pending cases9
- 19A729Comfort Delando Roberts v. Texas (19-6971)The application to recall and stay mandate addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court is denied.
- 19M92OWENS, JULIAN D. V. UNIVERSITY OF SC, ET AL.The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time is denied.
- 19M93PATTERSON, MAECHEL S. V. USDC ED NCThe motion for leave to proceed as a veteran is denied.
- 19M94SANTA, ERASMO V. HERR, MARIA T., ET AL.The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 is denied. 65, ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO The motion for review of the River Master's final determination is set for oral argument in due course. 142, ORIG. FLORIDA v. GEORGIA The Second Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed. Exceptions to the Report, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 45 days. Replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 30 days. Sur-replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 30 days. The motion for allowance of fees and disbursements filed by the Special Master’s assistant is granted, and the Special Master’s assistant is awarded a total of $10,036.43, for the period November 6, 2018, through December 5, 2019, to be paid equally by the parties.
- 18-9526Jimcy McGirt v. OklahomaThe motion for appointment of counsel is granted, and Ian H. Gershengorn, Esq., of Washington, D.C., is appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner.
- 19-373James Walker v. United StatesIt appearing that petitioner died on January 22, 2020, the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed.
- 19-465Peter B. Chiafalo, Levi Jennet Guerra, and Esther Virginia John v. Washington
- 19-518Colorado Department of State v. Micheal BacaPetitioners in No. 19-465 and respondents in No. 19-518 shall file opening and reply briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Respondent in No. 19-465 and petitioner in No. 19-518 shall file response briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
- 19-648CACI Premier Technology, Inc. v. Suhail Najim Abdulla Al ShimariThe Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Orders1
- 19-6684Rakeem Asaad Davis v. United StatesThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
Certiorari denied137
- 19-353Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. IBG LLC
- 19-510Jose Javier Banegas Gomez v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
- 19-517Daniel Barbosa v. Department of Homeland Security
- 19-522Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. IBG LLC
- 19-534Lahim Kadria v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
- 19-551Ronald Calzone v. Eric Olson, Superintendent, Missouri State Highway Patrol
- 19-574Sheila J. Poole, Commissioner, New York State Office of Children and Family Services v. New York State Citizens' Coalition for Children
- 19-582Sara Ann Edmondson v. Lilliston Ford Inc.
- 19-651John P. DeRose v. Village of Orland Park, Illinois
- 19-654Kaleida Health, dba Buffalo General Medical Center v. Kathleen Biondo
- 19-658J. G., By and Through His Parents, Howard Greenberg, et ux. v. Hawaii Department of Education
- 19-660David Silver v. Hamrick & Evans, LLP
- 19-674James L. Martin v. National General Assurance Company
- 19-681Andrew W. Shalaby v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- 19-683Jermaine Lenard Moss v. Kenny Atkinson, Warden
- 19-684Darrell Saunders, et ux. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
- 19-696Dan Haendel v. Anne Reed
- 19-697James Dwight Pavatt v. Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden
- 19-700Luis A. Ramos González v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico
- 19-705John F. Sharpe v. United States
- 19-712Hamp's Construction, LLC v. Inland Marine Services, L.L.C.
- 19-724Keith Y. Arakaki v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General
- 19-762Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
- 19-772Albert Diaz v. United States
- 19-809Michael Bonin v. United States
- 19-5638Jeffrey E. Lee v. Florida
- 19-5889Jonathan Torres-Arroyo v. New Jersey
- 19-6094Andres Herrera-Segovia v. United States
- 19-6191K. N., et ux. v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services
- 19-6214Luis Fuquen v. Trina Everitt
- 19-6289Brian Thomas Mohr v. United States
- 19-6306Jonathan Mota v. United States
- 19-6320Nalen Pierre Williams v. United States
- 19-6372Kelby Germaine Parson v. United States
- 19-6655Terrence Leonard Mathis v. United States
- 19-6657Rikisha S. Smith v. Dr. Scott
- 19-6660Ronald Fay Schermerhorn, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
- 19-6681Louis Milton Willis v. Territory of the Virgin Islands
- 19-6690Molly Ann Mahany v. City of Buffalo Police Department
- 19-6694Tim Sundy v. Martha C. Christian, Judge
- 19-6695Ilana Rigwan v. Jordan Lee Neus
- 19-6713Derek Tyler Horton v. Sam Cochran
- 19-6714Keith D. Goodman v. Eddie Pearson, Warden
- 19-6722Robin Leach, Jr. v. United States
- 19-6724Lorie Anne Gunderson Zarum, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Theodore Lee Gunderson v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
- 19-6727Tyrone Marvin Andrews v. Noah Nagy, Warden
- 19-6728Jose Anthony Heredia v. Florida
- 19-6730Cameron A. Harinarain v. Kevin Kauffman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon
- 19-6731Travell Henry v. Patrick Warren, Warden
- 19-6732Martin Stanley Ivie v. Washington
- 19-6733George R. Durham v. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of Pennsylvania
- 19-6734Arthur Lopez v. Cheryl Lopez
- 19-6737Leonard L. Little, Jr. v. Florida
- 19-6738William Ardas Sarringar v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
- 19-6741Jose Joaquin Ramirez v. Jeffrey C. Bloom
- 19-6742Jorge Prieto v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
- 19-6743Kenneth Dewayne Nelson v. Texas
- 19-6744Kevin M. Merck v. Minnesota Supreme Court
- 19-6745Joseph S. Paul v. Florida
- 19-6749Bryan Keith Johnson v. Florida
- 19-6750Ronnie R. Ceasar v. Louisiana
- 19-6754Cesareo Vizcarra Medina v. California
- 19-6762Fred Martin Wimberley v. Rachel M. Sacramento
- 19-6763Anthony D. White v. Florida
- 19-6765Anthony Lee McNair v. North Carolina
- 19-6767Douglas D. True v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
- 19-6768Cary VanDerMeulen v. Thomas L. Leclaire
- 19-6770Vinca S. Chiu v. First Group America
- 19-6771Larry Wayne Parr v. Simon E. Rodriguez
- 19-6777Iris Lamar Anderson v. Florida
- 19-6779Mitchell Stevens v. Darrell Vannoy, Warden
- 19-6780Darius Kinney v. Ohio
- 19-6782Adrienne Mallard v. Next Day Temps
- 19-6787Robert Lee Mitchell v. Miller, Magistrate Judge
- 19-6788Eber Roblero v. Florida
- 19-6817Anthony Wheeler v. Ron Neal, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
- 19-6822Guy Cozzi v. American Stock Exchange
- 19-6829Lisa Washington v. Diana Deleon
- 19-6861Tony L. Henderson v. Arkansas
- 19-6867Jose Luis Maya v. Department of Homeland Security
- 19-6900Aldon Smith v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- 19-6935Rickie James King v. United States
- 19-6936Pedro Vigio-Aponte v. United States
- 19-6947Reinaldo Rodriguez-Martinez v. United States
- 19-6940Kevin James Petroske v. United States
- 19-6941Michael Collins v. United States
- 19-6948Michael Eugene Spry v. United States
- 19-6953Donovan G. Davis, Jr. v. United States
- 19-6960Ulriste Tulin v. United States
- 19-6961Hernan Navarro v. United States
- 19-6968Brian David Brumbach v. United States
- 19-6970Monty Dwayne Sullivan v. Wyoming
- 19-6972Tarsis Guillermo Sanchez-Mora v. United States
- 19-6973Taiwan Wiggins v. United States
- 19-6975Jason Lee Bennett v. United States
- 19-6995Richard Alan King v. United States
- 19-6998Patrick Kofalt v. United States
- 19-7006Alvin Andrae Drummond v. United States
- 19-7008Abraham Hernandez-Zavala v. United States
- 19-7014Geoffrey Scott Gaffney v. United States
- 19-7020Nahach Garay v. United States
- 19-7026James W. Guy v. Ohio
- 19-7034Charley Joe, Jr. v. United States
- 19-7035Michael B. Lowry v. United States
- 19-7038Angela Maxine Lee v. United States
- 19-7041Pedro L. Ramirez-Rivera v. United States
- 19-7042Christian Rosado v. United States
- 19-7044Darmarcus Fisher v. United States
- 19-7051Adan Reyes-Martinez v. United States
- 19-7053Jason Dean Barnes v. United States
- 19-7056Robert Keith Kinsey v. United States
- 19-7059John Kenneth Schiefer v. United States
- 19-7062Florentino Villanueva, Jr. v. United States
- 19-7070Gary R. Tomey, II v. United States
- 19-7072Tyrone Walker v. United States
- 19-7075Matthew Rouse v. United States
- 19-7078Braun Nathan Thompson v. United States
- 19-7083Leroy L. Perdue v. United States
- 19-7084Andrew Haley Morcombe v. United States
- 19-7090Warren Evans, Jr. v. United States
- 19-7092Laforest Carmichael, aka LaForrest Carmichael v. United States
- 19-7098Antonio Shaw v. United States
- 19-7103Edward Merritt v. United States
- 19-7105Miguel Jilberto Vazquez-Chavarria v. United States
- 19-7106Peter Woodley v. United States
- 19-7107Joseph Thor Perkins v. United States
- 19-7115Alexander Faulkner v. United States
- 19-7117Vance Edward Ingram, III v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
- 19-515Baldassare Amato v. United StatesThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- 19-521ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.The motion of Jeremy C. Doerre for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
- 19-6658Booker Terry Simmons v. United States
- 19-6670Michael Bridge v. United States
- 19-6686Darren Kevin Hunter v. United States
- 19-6689Frank Fernandez v. United States
- 19-6755Frederick Garcia-Cruz v. United States
- 19-6759James A. Lackey v. United States
- 19-6769Steven Hicks v. United StatesThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Habeas corpus denied1
- 19-7147In Re Khayree SmithThe petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Mandamus denied4
- 19-7015In Re Michael F. Harris
- 19-7047In Re Antwoyn Spencer
- 19-7049In Re Antwoyn SpencerThe petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
- 19-6726In Re Billie ByrdThe petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.
Rehearings denied13
- 19-248Walid Jammal v. American Family Insurance Company
- 19-383Joseph Raimondo v. Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- 19-406Marilu F. Touma v. The General Counsel of the Regents
- 19-410In Re Richard J. Fields
- 19-5885Olufemi S. Collins v. Mark Gonzalez
- 19-5914Lena Lasher v. Roger Stavis
- 19-5925Kavin Maurice Rhodes v. Peter C. Swarth
- 19-6074Gerald Nelson v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1181-1061, AFL-CIO
- 19-6121In Re Matthew Lee Staszak
- 19-6231William Dean Chapman v. United States
- 19-6251In Re Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
- 19-6487Sean M. Donahue v. PennsylvaniaThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
- 19-6189Lewis Brown v. United StatesThe petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Attorney discipline11
- D-3035IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ANGELA M. BLYTHEAngela M. Blythe, of Oakland, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of October 29, 2018; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Angela M. Blythe is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3036IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL WILLIAM KWASNIKMichael William Kwasnik, of Hollywood, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of October 29, 2018; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael William Kwasnik is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3041IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRAMPTON DURBAN, JR.Frampton Durban, Jr., of Newberry, South Carolina, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of October 29, 2018; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3042IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICAH JARED SMITHMicah Jared Smith, of Wilmington, Delaware, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Micah Jared Smith is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3043IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN T. LYNCH, JR.John T. Lynch, Jr., of Scottsdale, Arizona, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that John T. Lynch, Jr. is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3045IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE B. McLEOD, IIIBruce B. McLeod, III, of Dallas, Texas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Bruce B. McLeod, III is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3046IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EPHRAIM CHUKWUEMEKA UGWUONYEEphraim Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye, of Silver Spring, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Ephraim Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3047IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARC NORMAN SILBERMANMarc Norman Silberman, of Cleveland, Ohio, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Marc Norman Silberman is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3048IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JERRY STEVEN PACKARDJerry Steven Packard, of Wooster, Ohio, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Jerry Steven Packard is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3050IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK BRIAN MORANMark Brian Moran, of Aviston, Illinois, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 5, 2019; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Mark Brian Moran is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3053IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BEN ELTON BRUNERBen Elton Bruner, of Opelika, Alabama, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of August 23, 2019; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Ben Elton Bruner is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.