Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Andrew W. Shalaby v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 19-2369 · judgment August 20, 2019


Certiorari denied · January 27, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

This petition involves the disbarment and denial admission of an attorney to the bar of a Federal Court in Chicago, Illinois for allegedly impugning the integrity of a judge in violation of American Bar Association [ABA] Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.2(a), a provision which states: A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualification or integrity of a judge.

  1. Can a Federal Court deny an attorney admission to the bar of the court, as a punishment for the alleged violation of ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.2(a), for expressing an opinion that a particular judge was required to disqualify himself based on the fact that before becoming a judge, he worked for the law firm representing a party to a proceeding before him, if the attorney erred as to the date of the judge’s employment with the firm?

  2. Does 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(2) require recusal of a judge who was a former member of a law firm and, who, after leaving the firm, maintained a co-counsel relationship with the firm at the same time that the firm represented a party in the matter in controversy?

  3. Should Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424 (1985) be overturned so that an order revoking an

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Andrew Wagdy Shalaby
Shalaby Law Office

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 27 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 08 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
  3. Nov 22 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)