Supreme Court Report

Order list

Friday, September 4, 2026

13 rehearings denied · 10 in pending cases · 4 discipline · The Court’s PDF · 609 U.S.

Orders in pending cases10

  1. 25A1388Raj Shekar v. Teledyne Technologies IncorporatedThe application for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court is denied. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
  2. 26A75Mary Joanna Comer v. Daniel Joseph TolanThe application for an injunction addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court is denied.
  3. 26A118CEMEx Construction Materials Pacific, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardThe application for stay of mandate addressed to Justice Alito and referred to the Court is denied.
  4. 26A145John Zhong v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles CountyThe application for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court is denied.
  5. 25-159Leonard W. Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.
  6. 25-170Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder CountyThe motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
  7. 25-246Kenneth J. Jouppi v. Alaska
  8. 25-417Francis Nielsen v. Kekai Watanabe
  9. 25-886Kenneth Genalo, Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement v. Carol Williams Black
  10. 25-1017Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia VotaThe motions of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendices are granted.

Rehearings denied13

  1. 24-1015John Doe v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York
  2. 25-743Gary Pisner v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
  3. 25-1028Porter Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections
  4. 25-1049Gilbert P. Hyatt v. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office
  5. 25-6020Christopher Maurice McDowell v. CVS Caremark Corp.
  6. 25-7003Roberto Corral v. Arrow Electronics, Inc.
  7. 25-7209Margaret Jean Lowery v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
  8. 25-7231Albert Glass v. Office of Chief Medical Examiner
  9. 25-7240Larry Wayne Kimes v. United States
  10. 25-7277Stacey Bernard Martin v. City of Las Vegas, Nevada
  11. 25-7448In Re Michael Sampson
  12. 25-7486Maryann Maltese v. Zohran Mamdani, Mayor of the City of New York
  13. 25-7489Kimarlo Ragland v. North Carolina Division of Employment SecurityThe petitions for rehearing are denied.

Attorney discipline4

  1. D-3159IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARY L. GUYMONGary L. Guymon, of Las Vegas, Nevada, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 20, 2026; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Gary L. Guymon is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  2. D-3160IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HENRY NEIL PORTNERHenry Neil Portner, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 20, 2026; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Henry Neil Portner is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  3. D-3161IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRIAN T. GOLDSTEINBrian T. Goldstein, of Overland Park, Kansas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 20, 2026; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Brian T. Goldstein is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  4. D-3162IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL ROY NACKMichael Roy Nack, of Clayton, Missouri, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 20, 2026; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael Roy Nack is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.