Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Michael Sampson
IFP petition
Question presented
LPO Pdice ctf'Pimen Vnkpo P/2aise.< J'u/23 PeSfFthciPt -P/dea fasts' ~TLe CAoik-ed DA tslM/i's'ed the Pe^kAaaA 6t?>e a^/v flpe/l. 7~ z?J7 P/ftfi? Piled frhout /h-e. Z/Xtej eir/dto/ce rd/nft JW&Tkfof fee. ThMSfitf rdfa ^7/Je.^ce ^ZToF7 X’g/&X//Z«<< TfyMitv&iyFi/iitt. />Pk^ R/k ft<P DJ PfcfaM ? ! L QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Z It} ^Xs // PRoPefl. JuStt'c.^ PoA. the Llta/led. ftfries Pi_>f>/Z?i'k'e. Cou/Zt t-a /Mires+&&/-£) linA.&R. z/s ouz-a/ rtuH.arzjfit. Par-fart! ClHinas oP L/d. Cn a irea.mm. rid CiA/SPfFrtcd All eQiiO PPi/kee A^fat/St L-Prunr//'tn Aa/4 /Ae Ac/i'ue. fuPP/zesfr'bA/ &P tke.U5P/(2 Pfi+ejd-Pej/ditO C)efiw , pRee. pM<efi.9b T&ckiudadyl IHS-cir^olHY-faF^ RiM Se.'fiJ AficlifieJ £du>A8.tl S&niPSoiv /t Lidded ftiti-eS Z.ASe Mai iodTrCir '£/&<? Z.O.Tk. £ ‘ 2SdPdl<?7Ybs ctPd. 25> 90593 5/Lt Co A . XWt Co Mofa^ 2 J Should ike SuPRQ/k<e CouRi demise 795 PPPeZ/A/tz du Aisd/ctcl) m Aiud Rule. -thz.Sif-th Co<a2-i of APPe/^lf did FfPof /'aj /Uot R.eim<P7rfs C.oMt/ic.PoA/ FR/LeSt Al<>tx>&.\feld<de uake.A/ rotheH CrraFi oPAPPeidr Ard DtheR St^PA.eike CouPr CnfeP hwe. Re.l/'e.fZCed And we/i/uMd hJke/v do PuLPc “P F°Pd‘P M/.-, PtaduJn!>, fi^trduizy-n^^ /Oo/zc^? 3?) 'Sk&uid the. SuP^erhe. £ou/l+ o/zAeA ike C.kieP 3ud<Se oP the ff'lPA Cou/Lt aP AAPesi/s ta 1 P P)fa.eiLtc.fr . fe.e ! dpdndPduunPAPA/hRr.Ai ir Da/Z/ed ftfr-kes Cfrce aJc .‘ /-2.5-6^-3/979 -iMPS 5^} CL aifa.pln<i/ t aF CTud/c/a I AliFFoAsdcjrt- > Pt Pik Cou/ZtaF APPesdc C ubjdd Judges Jbkfr D. Loire A/vd CnfaPL)#//P#Pke.£ C&faPlni'Mt of cJbd/c/Al dkPcoA/dvct j 3/dtk CouP/ of PPPen/f Tf>ctdjd^e » PIP-o/USa CJnAR.(e.£ 5iMe. of Te2cDf Ck/'eP CP'fedP//wA£f) CP>M.PjDfM tdtfcrfZNey Tpwyfl ‘FpZP'f °f ce‘l'u',u>'/ r,•'>/>»,■"«■ hei/^^e CdPdfPir- ^pp frAfd Afa- j-tjdJc.mbP P'F PAU-uKl PbUAjdrx-f, Pat a U2,%Ama/ aa c I CouPPaF^Ae /Lei eirAAr/ Ppd rilflhe/d nu/dveS5e$- /A -the. | C^S'e. AUo 2 5 - Or- <2/^19- Ai/er ty,
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Edward Sampson
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 13 2026DISTRIBUTED.
- Jun 18 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 15 2026Petition DENIED.
- May 27 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2026.
- Jan 14 2026Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.