Order list
Monday, August 19, 2024
31 rehearings denied · 6 in pending cases · 4 discipline · The Court’s PDF · 603 U.S.
Orders in pending cases6
- 23A700Cyrus Sanai v. Alex VillanuevaThe application for a certificate of appealability addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court is denied.
- 23A1163J. David Golub v. Berdon, LLPThe application for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court is denied.
- 24A29Rosalind Holmes v. United StatesThe application for injunctive relief addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court is denied.
- 22-7466Richard Eugene Glossip v. OklahomaThe joint motion of petitioner and respondent for divided argument is granted. The motion of Derek Van Treese, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument is denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
- 23-621Gerald F. Lackey, in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles v. Damian StinnieThe motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
- 23-715Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesThe motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.
Rehearings denied31
- 23-883Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange
- 23-1060Richard Rose v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State
- 23-1083Shula Waxwoman, fka Shlomit Ruttkamp v. The Bank of New York Mellon
- 23-1103Sawtooth Mountain Ranch, LLC v. United States Forest Service
- 23-1109Dietmar Hanke v. Arizona
- 23-6565In Re Derrick Thompson
- 23-6591Tracie Ledora Green v. U.S. Bank National Association
- 23-6678In Re Tina Wagoner
- 23-6692Mustafa Deville Reynolds v. United States
- 23-6705Lamar Lovett v. Texas
- 23-6781Stephanie Norman v. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc., dba Moffitt Cancer Center
- 23-6841Ronald D. Houston v. United States
- 23-6923Curtis Gorham v. Gary H. Lavine
- 23-6959Lionel Scott Ellison v. Peter Bludworth, Warden
- 23-7025Stevie Wyre v. Texas
- 23-7038Benjamin Thurman v. Rug Doctor
- 23-7077Wayne M. English v. Lowell T. Cage, as Trustee
- 23-7080Curtis Dwayne Vaughn v. Sean M. Flannery
- 23-7103Marilyn Eason v. Cook County Correctional Facility
- 23-7130In Re William Graven
- 23-7139Eugenia Woodard v. Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation
- 23-7193Jared Domei Maloid v. Texas
- 23-7200Willie Johnson v. Kenneth Nelson, Warden
- 23-7201Wayne Phillip Vance v. Glen Engstrom
- 23-7255Andrew Horace v. MD Now Medical Centers, Inc.
- 23-7274In Re Joseph T. Swift
- 23-7291In Re Furvio Flete-Garcia
- 23-7320Darrin Espinosa v. Contra Costa County, California
- 23-7335Walter J. Himmelreich v. Janel Fitzgerald
- 23-7414Mark A. VandenBoom v. Robert Strohmeyer
- 23-7423Glenn Francis v. Thomas Scarantino, WardenThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
Attorney discipline4
- D-3143IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF LAWRENCE DANIEL O'NEILLLawrence Daniel O'Neill, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3144IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF JACKSON BRETT HARRISONJackson Brett Harrison, of Dadeville, Alabama, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3145IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF SAMUEL ROBERT AUCOINSamuel Robert Aucoin, of Patterson, Louisiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-3146IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MICHAEL JOSEPH CAMMARANO, JR.Michael Joseph Cammarano, Jr., of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.