Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shula Waxwoman, fka Shlomit Ruttkamp v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al.
Paid petition · Appellate Court of Connecticut, No. AC45948 · judgment May 24, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
as follows: I. Is the lifting of the COVID-19 State Foreclosure Moratoriums and Stays Governor’s Tenth Supplemental State of Emergency Proclamation of May 21, 2020, (the protections against evictions) should deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and deny any defendants the protection of his . or her day in court and the benefit of the general law. II. Whether a judge should disregard new sufficient evidence of fraud and misrepresentation of facts to the court because of a previous Appellate Court ruling. Can a judge hear his own motion to disqualify and still apply due process and equal protection of the law? III. Whether there is an objective basis in fact for the statement that the honorable Connecticut Appellate Court repeatedly declined to protect the constitutional rights of a “Pro Se” foreclosure defendants.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shula Waxwoman
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Orders
Order list, June 10, 2024 · Certiorari denied
Order list, August 19, 2024 · Rehearing denied
Proceedings
- Aug 19 2024Rehearing DENIED.
- Jul 25 2024DISTRIBUTED.
- Jul 02 2024Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 10 2024Petition DENIED.
- May 21 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
- Feb 01 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 6, 2024)