Supreme Court Report

No. 19-518 · decided July 6, 2020

Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca

Colorado Department of State v. Micheal Baca, et al.. No separate writings.

Set from the PDF the Court published, which is the authoritative text. The small starred numbers are that PDF’s page numbers. A conversion can introduce errors; check a quotation against the original.

Syllabus

Prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader; it is no part of the opinion of the Court.

Held: The judgment of the Court of Appeals, which held that Colorado’s faithless elector law violates the Constitution, is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U. S. 578 (2020).

935 F. 3d 887, reversed.

Counsel

Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General of Colorado, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Eric R. Olson, Solicitor General, Grant T. Sullivan and Michael D. McMaster, Assistant Solicitors General, LeeAnn Morrill, First Assistant Attorney General, and Michael Kotlarczyk, Assistant Attorney General.

Jason Harrow argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were L. Lawrence Lessig, Sumeer Singla, Daniel A. Brown, Hunter M. Abell, Jonah O. Harrison, J. Max Rosen, and Jason B. Wesoky.*

Per Curiam

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U. S. 578 (2020).

It is so ordered.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the decision of this case.

Justice Thomas concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U. S. 578, 597–609 (2020).

← All opinions · The Justices, October Term 2019 →