Patricia A. Allen v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury

Whether, in a Title VII lawsuit, mixed Title VII claims, where causation evidence and facts supports the employee’s Retaliatory Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII Anti-retaliation provision§ 2000e-3(a), which requires the employee to prove she suffered “objectively tangible” harm ” and the same causation evidence and facts support the employees Retaliatory Discrimination work assignment claims, based on prior Title VII protected activity and race, under § 2000e-2(a)(l), which do NOT require the employee to prove she suffered “objectively tangible” harm ”, did the trial court abused its discretion to relay to the jury Title VII Section§ 2000e-3(a) jury instruction ( standard) provisions, and to exclude Title VII § 2000e-2(a)(l), jury instruction (standard) Provision, which deprived the jury of an opportunity to decide the retaliatory discrimination assignment claims, and to decide, under summary judgment standards, § 2000e-2(a)(l), with the application of objectively tangible harm standard? QUESTION-CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS Whether the employee, Petitioner {Allen} was denied a fair impartial jury trial under Title VII, the 5th Amendment, the United States Bill of Rights, District of Columbia Circuit prevailing case law, and the United States Supreme Court Authorities, in Muldrow, when the trial court;