William F. Kaetz v. United States, et al.

1 Questions to Consider Can this Court, consistently with its obligations to uphold and to enforce the Constitution, trade the constitu­ tionally guaranteed rights of millions of people to the pro­ tections of the Constitution’s enumerated separation of pow­ ers and its bill of rights, for the possibility of avoiding some difficulties that may arise from the finding of a separation of powers offense in student loan bankruptcy matters? If a separation of powers offense in student loan bankruptcy matters is found, would the actions of the Re­ spondents be a fraud, a fraud on the court, civil rights viola­ tion, intention infliction of emotional distress, and legal malpractice? And would the finding justify an injunction to stop the separation of powers offense? The Respondents are United States corporations, law firms, attorneys, and citizens. Do they have a legal and ethical obligation to support, uphold, and have allegiance to the Constitution of the United States? If so, and it is found their actions are willful and vio­ late and offend the Constitution, can a finding of wrongful treason be reasonable?