Supreme Court Report

Order list

Monday, February 26, 2024


74 denied · 3 mandamus denied · 5 rehearings denied · 7 in pending cases · 10 discipline · The Court’s PDF · 601 U.S.

Orders in pending cases7

  1. 23M61KATSVAIRO, TAWAINGA V. LIBERTY INDUSTRIES INC., ET AL.
  2. 23M62LEON, JOSE I. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
  3. 23M63JAMES, A. C. V. NEAL, WARDENThe motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
  4. 23-250Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
  5. 23-253Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Northern Arapaho TribeThe motion of respondents for divided argument is granted.
  6. 23-6303In Re Walter DrummondThe motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
  7. 23-6530Joseph Brodie v. United StatesThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 18, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Certiorari denied74

  1. 22-1216Dwayne Ferguson v. United States
  2. 23-351Rami A. Amer v. New Jersey
  3. 23-423Susan Porter v. Kelly Martinez, in Her Official Capacity as Sheriff of San Diego County
  4. 23-434Erie Indemnity Company v. Erie Insurance Exchange, By Troy Stephenson, Christina Stephenson, and Steven Barnett, Trustees ad Litem
  5. 23-537Faisal Ashraf, aka Sal v. United States
  6. 23-676Antonio Padilla v. Sally Hulse, Osage County Treasurer
  7. 23-679Gene Rechtzigel v. Green Valley Development, LLP
  8. 23-690Brant Putnam v. Timothy Ryan
  9. 23-691Samuel Ghee v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
  10. 23-707Yossi Govrin v. City of Santa Monica, California
  11. 23-723Joseph Randolph Mays v. T. B. Smith, Warden
  12. 23-728Janice Hargrove Warren v. Mike Kemp
  13. 23-735Stuart J. Shicks v. Indiana Department of Child Services
  14. 23-737Roman Melikov v. Ghilotti Bros., Inc.
  15. 23-756Angela Robinson v. Midland County, Texas
  16. 23-761Kionn Alls v. Florida Department of Revenue, on Behalf of Sharita Denise Gosa
  17. 23-777Herbert O. Chadbourne, Jr. v. Cumberland County District Court
  18. 23-813Brutus Trading, LLC v. Standard Chartered Bank
  19. 23-834Elizabeth Stafford v. International Business Machines Corporation
  20. 23-5447Antonio Chimney v. Texas
  21. 23-5659Cedric Theodis Hobbs, Jr. v. North Carolina
  22. 23-5698Roy Christopher West v. United States
  23. 23-5826Mary Ann German v. South Carolina
  24. 23-5827Keiron K. Sneed v. Illinois
  25. 23-5957Khadijah Bronson v. District of Columbia Department of Buildings
  26. 23-6078Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. v. South Carolina
  27. 23-6084Joe Stephens v. Alaska Division of Elections
  28. 23-6087Ronell Whitehead v. United States
  29. 23-6342Ya-Sin El-Amin Shakir v. Tina Walker, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette
  30. 23-6344Michael Broomer v. Delaware
  31. 23-6353Robert John Virnig v. Minnesota
  32. 23-6355Allan Leslie Sinanan, Jr. v. Pennsylvania
  33. 23-6356Mohammad Sharifi v. Alabama
  34. 23-6364Luis Guridi v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
  35. 23-6365Rodney Adam Hurdsman v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
  36. 23-6369Joseph R. Cyr v. Steven Harpe, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
  37. 23-6374Vonell Davis, Jr. v. Wayne Hill
  38. 23-6377Ryan F. Duncan v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
  39. 23-6380Noel Austin v. Tim Hooper, Warden
  40. 23-6381Roy Jackson v. Louisiana
  41. 23-6388Christopher J. Barnett v. David Guten, District Judge, District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
  42. 23-6389Michael Lavern Boyd v. Lay, Warden
  43. 23-6393Jeremy Jermaine Brooks v. James M. LeBlanc, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
  44. 23-6398Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts
  45. 23-6401Wayne Johnson v. Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder
  46. 23-6407Nira Woods v. Department of Housing and Community Development
  47. 23-6415Christian Cruz v. Florida
  48. 23-6423Jasper Frazier v. Christina Reagle, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Correction
  49. 23-6435Norman Williams v. Colorado Department of Corrections Time Computation Department
  50. 23-6459Alan Osterhoudt, Jr. v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
  51. 23-6464Michael Edward Aguilar v. Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry
  52. 23-6473Joseph Bergeron v. William Bolin, Warden
  53. 23-6501Kevin Keith v. Harold May, Warden
  54. 23-6514Tiffany Janis v. United States
  55. 23-6524Lynn Richard Norton v. United States
  56. 23-6525Michael Dukes v. E.M.S.A. HSA Stephanie Wood
  57. 23-6531Terrance Brown v. United States
  58. 23-6534Lucious M. Jackson v. Florida
  59. 23-6536Kidada Savage v. United States
  60. 23-6545Stephen Christopher Plunkett v. United States
  61. 23-6546Paul R. Hansmeier v. United States
  62. 23-6548Andrew Joseph Avitable, aka Andrew Joseph Larson v. Wyoming
  63. 23-6554Darlene Feiste v. United States
  64. 23-6556Robert Thrasher v. Georgia
  65. 23-6567Jonathan David Wilke v. Wisconsin
  66. 23-6570Bryan P. Hernandez v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington
  67. 23-6571Mark A. Panowicz v. Sharon L. Hancock
  68. 23-6575Racardo Jackson v. Ken Clark, Warden
  69. 23-6590Johnny Eugene Holton v. Georgia
  70. 23-6641Cedric A. Gray v. Wisconsin
  71. 23-6659Edward Logan v. Illinois
  72. 23-6662Gregory A. Rollins v. IllinoisThe petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
  73. 23-6258Sherman L. Fields v. Donald J. Trump, former President of the United StatesThe petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. See 28 U. S.C. §455 and Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, Canon 3B(2)(e) (prior judicial service).
  74. 23-6542Archie Cabello, aka Archibaldo Cabello, aka Archie Cabello, Jr., aka Archie P. Cabello, aka Arquimedes Cabello, aka Archie Palumbo v. United StatesThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Mandamus denied3

  1. 23-6315In Re Miguel Antonio Garcia
  2. 23-6395In Re Daniel Lee BeckleyThe petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
  3. 23-6313In Re Jason D. FisherThe petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

Rehearings denied5

  1. 23-338Byron V. Bush, et ux. v. Reliant Bank
  2. 23-448Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, LLC
  3. 23-5464Patrick Okeyo v. USCIS, Newark Office
  4. 23-5973Richard C. Duerson v. United StatesThe petitions for rehearing are denied.
  5. 23-6247In Re Tonya KnowlesThe petition for rehearing is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Attorney discipline10

  1. D-3125IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF CHASE TRISTAN ESPYChase Tristan Espy, of Vestavia, Alabama, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  2. D-3126IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MARY CATHERINE KILGUSMary Catherine Kilgus, of Hughesville, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  3. D-3127IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MAUREEN CALLAHAN REPETTOMaureen Callahan Repetto, of Wilmington, Delaware, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  4. D-3128IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF GEORGE M. ALLENGeorge M. Allen, of Los Angeles, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  5. D-3129IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF WILLIAM KALISHWilliam Kalish, of Tampa, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  6. D-3130IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MICHAEL TODD HOGANMichael Todd Hogan, of Louisa, Kentucky, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  7. D-3131IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DALE REESE JENSENDale Reese Jensen, of Staunton, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  8. D-3132IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF RICHARD BOLINGRichard Boling, of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  9. D-3133IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF EDWARD PAUL BRUEGGEMANEdward Paul Brueggeman, of Lawrenceburg, Indiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
  10. D-3134IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF DOROTHEA JANE KINGSBURYDorothea Jane Kingsbury, of Mayfileld Village, Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.