Supreme Court Report

No. 21-588 · decided December 10, 2021 · 595 U. S. 74

United States v. Texas

United States v. Texas, et al.. No separate writings.

Set from the PDF the Court published, which is the authoritative text. The small starred numbers are that PDF’s page numbers. A conversion can introduce errors; check a quotation against the original.

Syllabus

Prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader; it is no part of the opinion of the Court.

74UNITED STATES v. TEXAS et al.

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for

the fth circuit

No. 21–588 (21A85). Argued November 1, 2021—Decided December 10,

2021

Certiorari dismissed.

Counsel

Solicitor General Prelogar argued the cause for the United States. With her on the briefs were Acting Solicitor General Fletcher, Acting Assistant Attorney General Boynton, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harrington, Erica L. Ross, Mark R. Freeman, Michael S. Raab, and Daniel Winik.

Judd E. Stone II, Solicitor General of Texas, argued the cause for the state respondent. With him on the briefs were Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Brent Webster, First Assistant Attorney General, Lanora C. Pettit, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Beth Klusmann and Natalie D. Thompson, Assistant Solicitors General, and William T. Thompson.

Jonathan F. Mitchell argued the cause for private respondents. With him on the briefs were D. Bryan Hughes and Heather Gebelin Hacker.*

Per Curiam

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

76Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21–588 as improvidently granted.

← All opinions · The Justices, October Term 2021 →