No. 17-269 · decided June 11, 2018
Washington v. United States
Set from the PDF the Court published, which is the authoritative text. The small starred numbers are that PDF’s page numbers. A conversion can introduce errors; check a quotation against the original.
Syllabus
Prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader; it is no part of the opinion of the Court.
853 F. 3d 946, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Counsel
Noah G. Purcell, Solicitor General of Washington, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General of Washington, Fronda C. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, and Jay D. Geck and Anne E. Egeler, Deputy Solicitors General.
Allon Kedem argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Francisco, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wood, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kneedler, William B. Lazarus, and Evelyn S. Ying.
William M. Jay argued the cause for tribal respondents. With him on the brief were Brian T. Burgess, Jaime A. Santos, Kevin P. Martin, Riyaz A. Kanji, John C. Sledd, Jane G. Steadman, Mary Neil, James R. Sigel, Deanne E. Maynard, Brian R. Matsui, Thomas Zeilman, Craig Dorsay, Lea Ann Easton, Brian Gruber, Alan C. Stay, Ann E. Tweedy, Lauren Rasmussen, Steve Suagee, Sam Hough, Earle David Lees, Kevin R. Lyon, Samuel J. Stiltner, John Howard Bell, Harry R. Sachse, Timothy J. Filer, Scott Owen Mannakee, David Hawkins, Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., Tyler L. Farmer, Kristin Ballinger, James Rittenhouse Bellis, Emily Hutchinson Haley, and Mason D. Morisset.*
Per Curiam
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Justice Kennedy took no part in the decision of this case.