Gary Pisner v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

Whether the court that has jurisdiction over lawyer disciplinary matters can issue an opinion containing finding of facts and conclusions of law relating to disbarring an attorney after refusing to address extensive, constitutionally mandated due process deficiencies

Whether the court that has jurisdiction over lawyer disciplinary matters can use finding of facts and conclusions of law generated by a lower court or administrative entity, in a disbarment proceeding, after that lower court or administrative entity either refuses to address extensive constitutionally mandated due process deficiencies or claims that it lacked the jurisdiction to cure the referenced constitutionally mandated due process deficiencies and nevertheless generates a constitutionally defective product

Can a court assign and use a finding of facts and conclusion of law of a state entity when there are unaddressed, outstanding related prosecutorial misconduct vindictive prosecution and other issues related to that state entity?

Must a lawyer disciplinary proceeding address all Constitutional Due Process issues before the evidentiary proceedings that were raised at the start to avoid interjecting false and prejudicial material, which could undermine constitutional rights and procedural remedies in the future?