Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dennis G. Deppe v. Sandra M. Sovinski, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-10646 · judgment December 19, 2025


0%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
Rule 10: circuit split argued
GVR risk 0%

Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The judges of the U.S. District Court of the Middle District of Florida (FLMD) have been caught in organized crime with attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that has come from the military and links to employees from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that served under the Obama/Biden Whitehouse administration. The Petitioner was stalked, assaulted, and battered in three different episodes by the U.S. military and his own DOJ trying to end cases. One of the episodes of stalking, assaults, and batteries was in the district court proceeding of this case, in which the FLMD judges Julie Sneed and Embry Kidd (now on the Eleventh Circuit) participated. The FLMD judges are violating the district court’s Local Rule 1.05(a) to become improperly assigned to cases for DOJ attorneys, without proper jurisdiction. Once the FLMD judge takes improper control of the case, they use their judicial positions and the DOJ protection to commit the crimes explained in this petition, in this case as part of the military bribery scheme. The organized crime includes the chief judge of the FLMD, Marcia Howard, who oversees the random judicial assignment set by the district court’s Local Rule 1.05(a). One of the DOJ attorneys engaged with the FLMD judges in the court fraud is Randy Harwell in the Tampa, FL office. The questions presented are: 1. Does a federal judge who knowingly violates and circumvents a district court’s local rules, in this case Local Rule 1.05(a), to take improper

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Dennis G. Deppe

For respondent
Erin J. O'Leary
Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jul 22 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Jul 20 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Sandra Sovinski and Svetlana Shtrom to respond filed.
  3. May 07 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 17, 2026)