Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Caesarstone Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B352374 · judgment March 17, 2026
2%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
(petition-stage, structural)
Rule 10: circuit split argued
GVR risk 2%
Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
-
Does the language of petitioner’s SEC Form 20-F excuse respondent’s compliance with the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Documents?
-
Does SEC Form 20-F preempt all fifty states’ laws for purposes of designating an agent for service of process with respect to a foreign defendant?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Amir M. Kahana
Kahana & Feld LL P
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Sep 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 14 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 17, 2026)