Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Davantae London v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 25-20102 · judgment August 21, 2026


Pending

Questions presented

In the decision below, the court of appeals held that a plea agreement’s general appeal waiver that does not address the consecutive nature of a sentence bars such a challenge. The circuits are divided on this issue. The court also declined to consider whether a “clear and nonharmless” error in the Sentencing Guideline calculation may result in a miscarriage of justice that sets aside an appeal waiver. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether a general appeal waiver that does not mention the right to challenge the consecutive nature of a sentence bars such a challenge.

  2. Whether a “clear and nonharmless” error in calculating the Sentencing Guidelines range may constitute a miscarriage of justice sufficient to overcome an appeal waiver.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John Dennis Hester
Hester Law

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
—

Proceedings

  1. Oct 02 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2026)