Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Abrahim Fata v. Pennsylvania
IFP petition · Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, No. 563 EDA 2024 · judgment April 23, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause prohibits a state appellate court from applying a discretionary procedural rule to find an appeal "waived" when a pro se litigant has substantially complied with the rule's substantive requirements and the Commonwealth shows no prejudice.
-
Whether the state's refusal to review a sentencing record containing extensively materially false information-specifically a false allegation of stalking a minor which the trial court admitted it should not consider-violates the fundamental right to a meaningful opportunity to be heard when that refusal is based solely on a structural formatting error in a pro se brief.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Abrahim Fata
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- May 15 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2026)