Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carol Ann McBratnie v. Amazon.com, Inc.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 25-1744 · judgment March 6, 2026
Questions presented
-
Did the US District Court lack jurisdiction to compel arbitration under both the FAA and the Delaware Uniform Arbitration Act (exclusive jurisdiction)? This involves an intra- and inter-Circuit Court split regarding the Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc., 971 F.3d 904, 916-19 (9th Cir. 2020) FAA section 1 exemption decision. Two US District Courts deemed Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc. was no longer a valid precedent post Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, 596 U. S. 450 (2022). Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc. now requires reaffirmation as valid precedent by Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, 608 U.S. (5-28-2026), the Supreme Court decision that occurred after this case was decided in the Sixth Circuit.
-
Where, when and by whom should challenges to the legality of a contract be addressed, when arbitration is involved, where ‘gateway’ decisions are assigned to the Court, where severing of illegal clauses is contractually anticipated? The sub-question is 'If misclassifying workers to thwart the FLSA, would be an illegal unenforceable contract
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carol Ann McBratnie
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Unions (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Linked docket
25A1426
Proceedings
- Sep 24 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2026)
- Jun 22 2026Application (25A1426) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 26, 2026.
- Jun 16 2026Application (25A1426) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 28, 2026 to September 26, 2026, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.