Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joseph Thomas Saari v. Minnesota
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A25-0746 · judgment December 30, 2025
Questions presented
This case presents important nationwide issues concerning the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The dasefc that your petitioner has cited, in his belief, has fundamentally reshaped the freedom of speech clause in the First Amendment.
-
Did Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66, 73, 143 S. Ct. - 2106, 216 L. Ed. 2d 775(2023), announce a new substantive rule that has retroactive effect in cases on collateral review?
-
Did Moody v. Netchoise, LLC, 603 U.S. 707, 144 S. Ct. 2383- , 219 L. Ed. 2d 1075(2024), announce either a new rule of primiriaieprocedure or substantive Law that has effect in cases on collateral review?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Thomas Saari
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
First Amendment (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- Apr 22 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2026)