Trevor Johnson v. Shannon Butrum, Warden

DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENY PETITIONERS HABEAS CORPUS PETITION BECAUSE OF SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE § 2254 WITHOUT REVIEWING THE RECORD AS WELL AS BASING ITS DECISION ON THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PETITIONER ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIM WITHOUT REVIEWING THE RECORD OF THE CASE WHERE PETITIONER WAS CHARGED WITH FIRST-DEGREE RAPE, FIRSTDEGREE SODOMY, AND FIRST-DEGREE PERSISTENT FELONY OFFENDER WHICH WAS IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND; CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FEDERAL LAW, AS DETERMINED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER. DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENY PETITIONERS HABEAS CORPUS PETITION BECAUSE OF SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE § 2254 PETITION WITHOUT REVIEWING THE RECORD AS WELL AS BASING ITS DECISION ON THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FINDINGS WITHOUT REVIEW THESE ARGUMENT ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.