Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ker'Sean Olajuwa Ramey v. Texas
IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-74,896-02 · judgment September 21, 2026
Questions presented
-
Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals unreasonably disregarded clearly established Batson precedent and this Court’s recent emphatic clarification of the law in Pitchford by refusing merits review of a subsequent state habeas application alleging a constitutional violation that would have precluded any rational juror from imposing a death sentence.
-
Whether the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals unreasonably refused to review Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims where trial counsel failed to investigate and present readily available and substantial mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of Petitioner’s capital murder trial.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ronald Alan McIntire
Ashurst Perkins Coie US LLP
For respondent
Travis Golden Bragg
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Linked docket
26A380
Order
Miscellaneous order, September 23, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Sep 23 2026Reply of petitioner Ker'Sean O. Ramey filed.
- Sep 23 2026Application (26A380) referred to the Court.
- Sep 23 2026Application (26A380) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
- Sep 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 22 2026Application (26A380) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.
- Sep 22 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
- Sep 22 2026Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.