Frank Romero v. Corey Fhuere, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

FIRST QUESTION: Does a State violate the Constitutional Rights of an American citizen under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments that guarantees a fair and impartial jury trial when the United States Constitution guarantees a Defendant to be tried by an impartial and disinterested non-biased judge? SECOND QUESTION: Was Petitioner denied the right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution when it was discovered that the District Attorney handling the case was the judge’s son and the judge failed to recuse himself as required under Oregon law, failed to abide by Oregon’s Code of Judicial Conduct pursuant to Rule 3.10 mandating disqualification, and trial counsel failed to object to the judge failing to recuse himself, which affected the outcome of the trial? Page 2 of 10 - Petion for Writ of Certiorari Frank Romero, SID# 10024348 LIS I OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.