Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Bryan Stallworth v. Texas

IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-85,800-02 · judgment January 22, 2026

Pending

Questions presented

  1. Does the petitioner have a Sixth arid Fourteenth Amendment Right to have his client files as he was denied the right to possess discovery as a pro-se defendant before, during and after trial. Under Texas Law a pro-se defendant can only take notes from discovery presented and not possess any discovery for trial.

  2. Are the rulings of CrawfordBrady and Martin in conflict with Texas Code of Criminal Procdure 39.14 (d) and (f).

  3. This hi sr> the case of FIRST IMPRESSOIN as this Court has not rendered any decisions concerning the rights of client files to whom they belong to the attorney/lawyer or the client.

  4. Can the Highest Court of the State ignore the SUPREMACY CLAUSE by only setting fourth rulings of their own decisions which conflict with the United States Supreme Courtis decisions of precedence.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Bryan Stallworth

For respondent
—

Case

Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
—

Proceedings

  1. Apr 12 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2026)
    Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service