Sam Sando v. United States

Whether the district court properly (1) excluded the admission of sworn deposition statements used to impeach a hearsay declarant, (2) excluded a witness’s prior sworn testimony under Rule 801 when the testimony contained a statement against interest made by another declarant, (3) excluded evidence offered to impeach a government witness because the statement was made during an investigative interview, and (4) admitted evidence of an unrelated domestic incident under Rule 404(b) when the Government failed to identify a permissible non-propensity purpose for the evidence.