Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
James Michael Ryan v. Maryland
IFP petition · Appellate Court of Maryland, No. 2193, September Term, 2023 · judgment September 3, 2025
Question presented
Whether The Due Process Clause permits a State to expand second-degree "Depraved Heart" murder liability: a) to encompass a physician's off-label prescribing decisions absent Constitutionally clear standards distinguishing criminal malice from protected medical judgement. b) by applying a particular mens rea to a charge [non-narcotic distribution] that does not demand the use of physical force "against the person.or property of another." ■ Whether a State court decision criminalizing a physician's prescribing practices conflicts with long standing federal recognition and acceptance of lawful off-label prescribing within the practice of medicine. Whether the Constitution permits homicide liability to be imposed based primarily upon retrospective disagreement with medical.treatment decisions, rather than proof of traditionally understood malice sufficient to distinguish murder from negligence, malpractice, or regulatory violations. Whether the State decision fails to provide constitutionally adequate notice of what prescribing conduct transforms a licensed physician exercising clinical judgement into a murder suspect to life-altering , criminal penalties.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Michael Ryan
For respondent
Jeremy Hugh Welter
Office of the Attorney General of Maryland
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 13, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 13 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 24 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2026.
- Sep 22 2026Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
- Mar 13 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2026)