Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George Shrader v. Richard Comerford, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-13366 · judgment March 17, 2026
Questions presented
-
WHETHER PETIONER WAS AFFORDED DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE THE STATE OF FLORIDA OBTAINED IMPROPER AND MULTIPLE REHEARINGS IN THE CASE?
-
WHETHER THE STATE COURT DECISION WAS BASED ON AN UNREASONABLE DETERMINATION OF THE FACTS IN LIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN THE STATE COURT PROCEEDING WHERE THE JURORS WERE IN POSSESSION OF AN HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL NEWSPAPER ARITICLE IN THE JURY ROOM DURING THE TRIAL?
-
WHETHER OR NOT AEDPA’S SUBSTANTIAL DEFERENCE IS CONSTITUTIONAL IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT’S DECISION IN LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES V. RAIMONDO, 144 S.CT. 2244 (2024)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George Shrader
For respondent
Sonya Roebuck Horbelt
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 13, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 13 2026Petition DENIED.
- Sep 24 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2026.
- Sep 23 2026Waiver of right of respondent Comerford, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
- Jun 10 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2026)