Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alaa Elkharwily v. Mohamed E. Elkharwely, et al.
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, No. 38201-0-III, 38347-4-III, 38348-2-III · judgment July 24, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether an appellate court’s dismissal of an appeal based on a record that is undisputedly admitted by court personnel to be incomplete, falsified, or deliberately obscured by systemic record destruction violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
Whether the failure of appellate judicial officers to disqualify themselves—where they are actively named as defendants in a related federal lawsuit involving the same parties and identical allegations of criminal misconduct—constitutes a jurisdictional nullity that renders any subsequent order of dismissal void ab initio.
-
Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory authority to address a documented pattern of systemic criminal misconduct—including record destruction, forgery, and witness tampering—by judicial officers and court staff that has effectively shielded a corrupt institutional enterprise from federal accountability. Page 2 of 22
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alaa Elkharwily
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Linked docket
25A1221
Proceedings
- Jul 06 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2026)
- May 06 2026Application (25A1221) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 4, 2026.
- May 04 2026Application (25A1221) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 5, 2026 to July 4, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.