Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Alaa Elkharwily v. Mohamed E. Elkharwely, et al.

IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, No. 38201-0-III, 38347-4-III, 38348-2-III · judgment July 24, 2025


Pending

Questions presented

  1. Whether an appellate court’s dismissal of an appeal based on a record that is undisputedly admitted by court personnel to be incomplete, falsified, or deliberately obscured by systemic record destruction violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  2. Whether the failure of appellate judicial officers to disqualify themselves—where they are actively named as defendants in a related federal lawsuit involving the same parties and identical allegations of criminal misconduct—constitutes a jurisdictional nullity that renders any subsequent order of dismissal void ab initio.

  3. Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory authority to address a documented pattern of systemic criminal misconduct—including record destruction, forgery, and witness tampering—by judicial officers and court staff that has effectively shielded a corrupt institutional enterprise from federal accountability. Page 2 of 22

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Alaa Elkharwily

For respondent
—

Case

Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
—

Linked docket
25A1221

Proceedings

  1. Jul 06 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2026)
  2. May 06 2026
    Application (25A1221) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 4, 2026.
  3. May 04 2026
    Application (25A1221) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 5, 2026 to July 4, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.