Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alaa E. Elkharwily v. Mohamed E. El-Kharwely, et al.
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, No. 38789-5-III, 39196-5-III, 39197-3-III · judgment July 24, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether an appellate court’s dismissal of an appeal based on a record that is undisputedly admitted by court personnel to be incomplete, falsified, or deliberately obscured by systemic record destruction violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
Whether the failure of appellate judicial officers to disqualify themselves—where they are actively named as defendants in a related federal lawsuit involving the same parties and identical allegations of criminal misconduct—constitutes a jurisdictional nullity that renders any subsequent order of dismissal void ab initio.
-
Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory authority to address a.documented pattern of systemic criminal misconduct—including record destruction, forgery, and witness tampering—by judicial officers and court staff that has effectively shielded a corrupt institutional enterprise from federal accountability. Page 2 of 18
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alaa Elkharwily
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
—
Linked docket
25A1432
Proceedings
- Jul 06 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2026)
- Jun 24 2026Application (25A1432) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 4, 2026.
- May 04 2026Application (25A1432) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 5, 2026 to July 4, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.