Lola Bonitta McGee v. David Steiner, Postmaster General, et al.

When an exemplary employee works for the United States Postal Service, in management, and the employee was discriminated against, by management, the employee’s life was threatened and she had a Nervous Breakdown, as a result, and she had a Heart Operation due to the threats to her life, then was forced into a Medical Disability Retirement at age 47, who holds the employer, the federal government to account for the catastrophic damage that was done to the employee?

If the federal government caused harm to a human being (Employee) and that entity investigates itself, is that entity required to admit their wrongs and make human beings whole for their actions, behavior, and ill intent? If the employee was incapacitated, traumatized, immobilized, psychotic, and incapable of addressing required processes to hold the agencies, and courts accountable for their inaccuracies, who stands up for the employee, that has had help submitting her documentation, but could not verbally speak for herself, because of the harm that was done to her by the government?

If the government has counsel to represent them in a case for doing wrong against human beings, then why doesn’t the federal employee get counsel paid for by the federal government they work for?

If a person’s life was threatened by the federal government, did that entity commit a crime? Also, should the processing federal agencies be held accountable for the intentional lies, cover up, and their own corrupt actions and behaviors during their investigation?

Is there a law for threats of violence in the federal government workplace, then where is the accountability for me?

If people are harassed at work or home, anywhere, should those perpetrators be held accountable for their actions and behavior; or not?

Regardless to where a person works in the United States, should that matter in being treated with dignity and respect? Also, if supporting documentation is submitted on behalf of the employee, why is it overlooked, and narratives are written as if the employee did not submit sufficient evidence?

If people are highly skilled, knowledgeable, and know how to lead by example, boost morale and performance in their duties, should they be denied upward mobility regardless of if they are considered black, white, or brown?

Does the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES believe that there is racism, reverse racism, double standards, and abuse of power, which stifle the growth and development of all society?

Should human beings strive to be better, grow from mistakes that were not intentional, and meet the challenges they face by letting their voice be heard, but if the powers that be are precluding their growth, should those people in those positions be held accountable for their actions and behavior of jealousy and insecurity?

Does this court believe that racism, double standards, and abuse of power adversely affect human life, society, and the economy?

Does the court believe people want to work, fulfill their purpose, and be treated fairly and justly?

Should a person’s faith in GOD be the reason that they are discriminated against when that faith is the wind beneath their wing, it’s how they function as a human being?

Should a person’s faith to pray over food be denied?

Should upper management of any workplace pressure their subordinates to carry out orders even if the orders are malicious, wrongdoing, and personal vendettas against the employee, be it staff or employees?

Should the way a human being votes in the United States be held against them and cause adversity by their co-workers or superiors?

Does the Supreme Court of the United States believe that because of a person’s sex, age, gender, faith, ancestry, and all else that encompass human life, should they be subjected to threats of violence, retaliation, sexual harassment, physical and psychological rape, and fear of reprisal of the people that did these actions and behaviors, and is it warrant against the victims?

If anywhere, any workplace cause human beings catastrophic damage that leads to their demise, life as they knew it to be, should the individuals that are responsible and their superiors that allowed it to happen be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, and if a law doesn’t exist, should one be created to protect people from such behavior are there will be consequences and accountability.

Does the United States Supreme Court believe that wrongdoing to human beings’ lives should be held to account? Mayhem was committed on my heart, without any heart problems - Ablation, because my life was threatened by my boss?

Does the court believe that a person that was physically, mentally, emotionally, financially, educated with a wealth of knowledge, skills, ability and able to lead in personal and professional life, along with treating all people with dignity and respect, should be crucified because of who they are, and the color of what society says their skin color is (Black)? Is this Slavery?

Should those that are mentally, physically, emotionally, psychotic, five in terror, and trauma , with poor cognition, be required to meet protocol, dates, filings, represent themselves, misused and abused by a self­ driven narrative in a systematic way, rather its attorneys, court reporters, deposition testimony’s, government officials and agencies, mom and pop companies, jurist, and all entities in any capacity, be required to represent themselves and be treated unjustly because the people cannot help the condition that was cause to them through no fault of their own?

Does anyone have the right to take a person’s life, health, and welfare, have them work to promote them and they will NEVER know how they would have grown older in health, for the rest of their life?

Should anyone be forced to work for free, after doing their duties at a higher level and working in their position for years?

Has anyone worked a position for years and desired upward mobility, and was over qualified than those promoted (17), interview four times out of the (17) positions, worked in seven different offices in Nevada, and flown to Reno, was addressed as the clean-up woman, but there was always an excuse of not getting the promotions, you are too confident, it’s a matter of win not if, but you interview very well, and never received a promotion?

Is it appropriate to ask a person, while being interviewed, about their personal life, home, and their child’s educational accomplishments and things of that nature?

Does the United States Supreme Court believe without consequences, and accountability, racism, abuse of power, and double standards will continue to feaster evil, hatred, and disdain for society and stunt the growth of America until accountability for these atrocities are actualized by law?

Is it ethical for the Nevada District Court, the EEOC, DOL/OWCP, and the US Postal Service to act as if Ms. McGee was competent to handle her requirements, in addressing her case and claims, which is to file content driven appeals and be timely, and stand to speak before the court when she was incompetent, also, with slurred speech, and a confused mind, according to her presence, speaking over the phone, and her medical documentation says so? Are any of these people medical providers?

Is it protocol for the DOL/OWCP to set the standard for all other federal agencies to follow, including the courts, by not acknowledging Ms. McGee’s injuries/illnesses, because she was threatened by her co-worker, and boss, which is what made her mentally disabled, and have a Nervous Breakdown?