Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Johnny Walls-Bey
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
Does a state appellate court violate the Due Process Clause and the Supremacy Clause when itweaponizes an unpublished administrative orderto convert a mandatory civil rights appeal (protecting First Amendment petitioning) into a discretionary criminal proceeding to shield proven police perjury and Brady violations from federal review?
-
Must an Extraordinary Writ of Prohibition issue under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 to halt ongoing state probation revocation proceedings where the state courts, acting wholly absent subject-matter jurisdiction, have weaponized an unappealable administrative docket (1 CA-CR 26-0250 PRPC) to shield rogue officials who are prosecuting a Tribal Citizen in bad-faith retaliation—in direct violation of the Dombrowski doctrine—forexercising his First Amendment rightto expose how the State deliberately suborned perjury and withheld Brady evidence to bypass mandatoryfederal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) jurisdiction? 2 of 16
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Johnny Ray Walls-Bey
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
- Aug 17 2026Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2026)