In Re Luis Requeno-Portillo

DID A STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT DECISION TO DENY PETITIONER'S STATE HABEAS CORPUS WRIT APPLICATION TO ALLEGATIONS OF INEFFE­ CTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL AND APPELLANT COUNSEL IN VIOLATION TO THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION , WHERE THE STATE PROSECUTOR AND TRIAL COURT FILED A PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TO DISMISS HABEAS CORPUS WRIT APPLICATION FOR NON-COMPLIANT TO STATE RULES/ BUT STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT HAD DENIED HAB­ EAS CORPUS WRIT WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER /HAD DENIED PETITIONER'S COLLATERAL REVIEW PROCESS AND FAILED TO ADJUDICATE CONSTITU­ TIONAL ALLEGATION ON THE MERITS, WHERE SUCH PROCEEDINGS BY THE STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT SO FAR DEPARTED FROM ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS TO CALL FOR AN EXERCISE OF THIS COURTS SUPERVISORY POWERS ?

DID A STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT DECISION TO DENY PETITIONER'S STATE HABEAS CORPUS WRIT ALLEGATIONS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL AND APPELLANT COUNSELS IN VIOLATION TO THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHERE TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO OBJECT AND PRESERVE FOR APPEL­ LANT REVIEW OF TRIAL COURTS IMPROPER REMOVAL OF A SELECTED JUROR FOR SLEEPING AND TRIAL COUNSELS FAILURE TO CONTINUOUSLY OBJECT TO TRIAL COURTS ERR OF ALLOWING EVIDENCE OF CO-DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA, WHICH CONFLICTS WITH OTHER STATE COURTS AND CALLS FOR AN EXERCISE OF THIS COURTS SUPERVISORY POWERS ?