Gregory Owens v. Richard Comerford, Secretary, Department of Corrections

POINT I. WHETHER ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL SHOULD HAVE GRANTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS TO THE CLAIMS RAISED WHERE PETITIONER MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. §2253 POINT II. WHETHER ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAVE GRANTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON CLAIM THAT 28 U.S.C. §2254 IS FOUND TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN LIGHT OF THE DECISION RENDERED IN LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES V. RAIMONDO. 144 S. CT. 2244 (2024) RULE 14.1(b)(i) >