Arsen Manson v. California, et al.

Under SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Rule 10 (c), Petitioner Declares a Conflict of Interest in FACTUAL FUNDING SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE during on ORIGINAL Los angeles County Superior Court case No. MA059036 (The PEOPLE of The STATE of CALIFORNIA v. ARSEN MANSON, (On March 13, 2013, Judgment entry date see "Conflict of Interest Declares on First trial on March 18, 2013" (Appendix F, p. 26)). The STATE of CALIFORNIA on October 28, 2013, FOUND Petitioner GUILTY for FELONY and sentenced to State Prison on 4.5 years. STATE of CALIFORNIA . on June 12, 2019, FOUND Petitioner NOT GOULTY and case was Fully DISMISSED. QUESTION IS, HOW THE JUDGMENT PROVE ITS CONVICTION UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 28 U.S.C. §§ 2072-2074 (Rules Enabling Act) and FEDERAL RULE of EVIDENCE (FRE) 803(22), AS THEY EXISTED in March 2013?