Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Andrea Rowlette
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
Whether this Honorable Court may render an order of mandamus compelling USARC DCS G-l, the final “denial/release" authority, to expedite and release the electronic [un]redacted file(s) to the appellant and reimbursement of fees paid.1 FOIA Request(s) include: FA-24-0108 [substantive verbatim [un]redacted trial proceedings voice recording (via mp3 secure email)], FA-25-0117, FA-25-0130, FA-25-0126, FA-25-0016.
-
Whether this Honorable court will determine after review of an investigation [with appointment of Counsel for the appellant (and/or a Special Master) and denying the opposing parties of any requests for extensions delaying any swift relief (Supreme Court Rule 21.4)] of the Adverse Administrative Separation, Article 15-6 for the appellant and matters fully surrounding to include the lack of due process of the associated congressional inquiries,2 Res Ipsa Loquitur— will/may deem award for immediate injunctive and compensatory relief warranting: full restoration/reversal of the Article 15 and bar of all lesser included offenses from retrial as affirmed by "new" substantial and compelling evidence on direct review.3
-
Whether after appointment of Special Masters to investigate if the U.S. (it’s employees), Department of War ((Defense) and its employees), associated pharmaceutical companies, Mr. Gates, Dr. Fauci, violated Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution— so much as to warrant a pardon and any exemption or any immunities for the compromising of national security and the public's health by lowering safeguards, manipulating and inciting fear to the grand public for mass compliance with the Covid-19 vaccine mandate, the “Covid19 virus”, enforcement of infection prevention, that encouraged the assault on humanity (including the appellant) from the bioengineering of the corona ' UCMJ Rule 1112(e) (1)(A); 18 U.S. Code § 3500; see appendix 36 & 37. 2 UCMJ § 931g. Art. 131g; UCMJ § 931 f. Art. 131 f; UCMJ App. 2.1 (2.1-7,3.1), UCMJ MOU App. 3; UCMJ Rule 103(c); UCMJ Rule 203; see all appendices attached. 3 UCMJ § 907(D) (i-ii) (prosecution is barred by the president; immunity from prosecution granted by a person authorized to do so; UCMJ § 875 ART. 75, § 859. Art. 59.; UCMJ § 837. Art. 37; UCMJ R.C.M. 915; U.S. Constitution Amendments V & XIV (due process).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrea N. Rowlette
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- Aug 21 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Feb 28 2026Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2026)