Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Markell Anthony Coleman v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-10693 · judgment May 4, 2026


Pending

Question presented

In Brown v. United States, 602 U.S. 101 (2024), this Court held that whether a prior state drug trafficking conviction qualified as a predicate under the Armed Career Criminal Act in a federal prosecution required a review of the state conviction at the time of the conviction. However, this Court expressly left open the question of whether a federal sentencing court must review the state conviction at the time of the federal sentencing, rather than at the time of the conviction, for a recidivist enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines given the requirement that the Sentencing Guidelines in effect at sentencing must be applied. The First Question Presented here is: Whether, consistent with federal statute mandating the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing, a sentencing court must look to the validity of a state prior at the time of federal sentencing to determine whether the state conviction qualifies as a predicate offense for a recidivist sentencing enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines? This Court recently granted a petition for a writ of certiorari on the question of “whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles.” Viramontes v. Cook County, No. 25-238 (June 30, 2026), see also Grant v. Higgins, No. 25-566 (June 30, 2026). Mr. Coleman entered a plea of guilty to a charge of possession of an unregistered machinegun. Factually, Mr. Coleman was in possession of a small metal object known as a conversion device which allows an AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle to fire ten shots with one pull of a trigger. The Second Question Presented here is: Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess an AR-15 platform semiautomatic rifle outfitted with a conversion device or a conversion device which allows an AR-15 platform semiautomatic rifle to shoot ten times with a single pull of the trigger?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Bernardo Lopez
Federal Public Defender

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history

Proceedings

  1. Sep 01 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 5, 2026.
  2. Aug 31 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  3. Jul 31 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2026)