Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Steven Michael Backstrom v. Texas

IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-76,283-17 · judgment April 2, 2026


Pending

Question presented

QUESTION ONE: Is due process as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment violated where a habeas petitioner satisfies every legal habeas require­ ment set forth in state juiispruden.ce yet the state's highest criminal appellate court dismisses the application under pro­ cedural default? QUESTION TWO: Where the dismissal of a habeas application by the state's highest criminal appellate court infers the applicant could have raised his new factual basis-claim in a previously submitted applica­ tion.- what is due diligence as it relates to reasonable ascertain­ ability and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? o

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Steven Backstrom

For respondent

Case

Conference history

Proceedings

  1. May 01 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2026)