Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Steven Michael Backstrom v. Texas
IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-76,283-17 · judgment April 2, 2026
Question presented
QUESTION ONE: Is due process as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment violated where a habeas petitioner satisfies every legal habeas require ment set forth in state juiispruden.ce yet the state's highest criminal appellate court dismisses the application under pro cedural default? QUESTION TWO: Where the dismissal of a habeas application by the state's highest criminal appellate court infers the applicant could have raised his new factual basis-claim in a previously submitted applica tion.- what is due diligence as it relates to reasonable ascertain ability and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? o
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Steven Backstrom
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
—
Proceedings
- May 01 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2026)