Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ruben Santoyo v. Supreme Court of the United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 25-5012 · judgment October 20, 2025


Pending

Questions presented

  1. Whether the D.C. Circuit erred by applying mandamus jurisdiction doctrine — which prohibits lower courts from compelling the Supreme Court's Clerk to act — to dismiss a constitutional due process claim challenging a completed administrative act: the Clerk's rejection of a petition for writ of certiorari without referral to any Justice, without process, and without any mechanism for judicial review.

  2. Whether the Clerk of this Court, acting in a non-judicial administrative capacity, may reject a petition for writ of certiorari without referral to any Justice and without any reviewable process, in a manner that forecloses a citizen's constitutional right of access to this Court under the First and Fifth Amendments — particularly where the government has never been required to defend that practice in any adversarial proceeding.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ruben Santoyo

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history

Linked docket
25A933

Proceedings

  1. Jun 08 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2026)
  2. Feb 24 2026
    Application (25A933) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 9, 2026.
  3. Feb 18 2026
    Application (25A933) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 10, 2026 to June 9, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.