Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pedro Antunez-Galarza v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-11593 · judgment March 3, 2026
Question presented
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, facially and as applied to intrastate firearm possession? 1 1 This Commerce Clause question is pending in Storey v. United States, No. 25-7216 (response requested May 26, 2026), and Stewart v. United States, No. 26-5131 (filed July 20, 2026).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
M. Allison Guagliardo
Office of the Federal Defender
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Federalism (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
- Oct 06 2026Reply of petitioner Pedro Antunez-Galarza filed.
- Sep 30 2026Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
- Sep 01 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2026.
- Aug 31 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2026 to September 30, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 24 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2026)